Some language specialists like Van Dijk claims that a few of the following prevailing parallels have been discovered in studies from the press:
Most of the dominant subjects are directly or even more subtly connected with problems, difficulties, or risks towards the dominant values, interests, goals, or culture.
Ethnic occasions are consistently referred to from the Whitened, majority perspective.
Subjects which are relevant for that regular daily existence of ethnic groups, for example work, housing, health, education, political existence, and culture, in addition to discrimination during these areas, are hardly talked about within the press unless of course they result in “problems” for society in general or when they’re spectacular in some manner.
These general trends apply straight to language minority concerns. Press coverage from the recent antibilingual education ballot measures in California, Arizona, Massachusetts, and Colorado discloses some understanding of how details about bilingual education is circulated. Whereas newspapers are just one of many media assets open to scientists, recent reports have shown an immediate correlation between your representation of bilingual education in newspapers and public voting trends within the cases pointed out above, as stated by Otto Santa Ana and Eric Manley.
Although such studies might effectively display how magazines often project pictures of bilingual education towards the public, you have to think about the many factors that constitute a newspaper article, as well as their various kinds, to be able to comprehend the issues clearly. In the broad outlook during audience census towards the minute detail of the baby journalist’s own perspective, the ultimate print form of a newspaper article continues to be wrought by multiple influences.
A particular illustration of this is often observed in the press coverage from the 2000 Arizona Proposition 203 campaign, also called the “British for him or herInch ballot initiative. Supporters of Proposition 203 marketed the finish of bilingual education in support of a “protected British immersion” method of language minority education. Arizona attention surrounding this political fight discloses how newspapers conveyed messages concerning bilingual education, subtly or directly.